Peer Review Process

SSLJ is committed towards upholding highest standards of review procedure and follow double blind peer review policy where authors and reviewers selected are unaware of each other. All the submissions undergo comprehensive review by in house editors and are subsequently allotted to experts for the second stage of blind peer - review.

It is to be noted that both the in- house editorial team and author identities are concealed from the expert reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.

For this purpose, the in- house team shall allot serial code numbers to the respective papers, which stand as their identification throughout the process.

To this regard, SSLJ follows the peer review guidelines followed by the world’s leading journals. Editorial & Peer Review Process.

Articles submitted to Shodh Sanchay Mutidisciplinary quarterly A Journal of Smt.A.P.Patel Arts & N.P.Patel Commerce College of Gujarat University are evaluated based on their alignment with the journal's scope, academic quality, novelty, relevance to our readership, and their contribution to Vidya’s core objectives. We employ a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both the authors' and reviewers' identities remain anonymous.

If the manuscript passes the initial screening, it is assigned to a handling editor, who forwards it to at least two expert reviewers. The manuscript is anonymized, and a double-blind peer review is conducted. If the manuscript does not pass the initial screening, it is rejected without further review.

In the final stage, the handling editor decides whether the revised manuscript meets the standards for publication. If accepted, the manuscript is queued for typesetting, proofreading, and publication in an upcoming issue. If the revisions are inadequate, the manuscript is rejected.

This process ensures that all articles published in Shodh Sanchay Multidisciplinary Quarterly published Literary Journal meet the highest standards of academic quality and relevance.

The Journal is committed towards upholding highest standards of review procedure and follows a double blind peer review policy where authors and reviewers selected remain unfamiliar to one another. All the submissions undergo comprehensive review by in house editors followed by the second stage of blind peer review by external experts.

It is to be noted that the identities of both the in-house editorial team and authors remain concealed from the expert reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. For this purpose, the in-house team shall allot code numbers to the respective papers, which stand as their identification throughout the process.